Editorial standards support for consequential reporting.

Independent review, practical policy, and experienced guidance for newsrooms, podcast and documentary teams, independent creators, and counsel working through difficult editorial questions.

A cinematic sequence of reporting, camera, production, and recorded-audio images
01

Pre-publication review

Independent pre-publication review of stories, scripts, podcast episodes, and documentary projects for fairness, sourcing, verification, attribution, language, and editorial risk.

Explore the service →
02

True-crime podcast standards

Editorial standards and ethics guidance for true-crime and narrative podcasts, including disputed facts, sourcing, corroboration, requests for comment, episode framing, and corrections.

Explore the service →
03

Editorial policy and training

Practical editorial policy development and newsroom standards training covering accuracy, fairness, sourcing, verification, corrections, escalation, and approval processes.

Explore the service →
04

Defamation expert witness

Chris Scholl is available in selected defamation and libel matters to explain newsroom standards, sourcing, verification, fairness, editorial process, and corrections practice.

Explore the service →
01

Clarify the decision.

Define the project, its stage, the deadline, and the editorial questions that require the closest attention.

02

Examine the reporting.

Review the relevant material, sourcing, verification, fairness steps, language, context, and editorial workflow.

03

Make the guidance usable.

Identify priorities, explain the reasoning, and help the team make decisions it can apply and defend.