Availability in selected matters
The primary practice is consulting on newsroom standards, reporting practice, verification, and editorial decision-making. In selected matters, Chris is also available to counsel where the relevant issues turn on sourcing and corroboration, fairness, pre-publication review, treatment of disputed facts, editorial process, and corrections or updates.
This background may be useful in libel, defamation, and related matters when the questions concern the reporting and publication process. The role, where relevant, is not to offer legal conclusions, but to explain newsroom standards and editorial process as they are ordinarily applied inside professional news organizations.
How an engagement can help
Depending on the matter, work may include review of reporting and editorial materials, chronology and process analysis, explanation of common newsroom workflows and decision points, and assessment of where sourcing, verification, fairness, and post-publication response fit within the overall editorial process.
Chris does not offer legal opinions, damages opinions, or public-relations advocacy. Editorial practice is not a substitute for legal analysis, and any engagement must present a clear fit with his experience in newsroom standards, investigative reporting, verification, editorial review, and corrections practice.
Initial fit review
What to include
Send a brief, non-confidential note with party names for conflicts purposes, venue and current posture, the publication or broadcast at issue, key deadlines, and the specific newsroom standards questions on which input may be useful.
Contact for initial fit review Review expert witness services →