Questions the work can help explain
Newsroom standards questions often concern process: what reporters and editors knew, how they evaluated sources, what verification was attempted, how contrary information was handled, and what decisions were made before and after publication.
Analysis may include review of reporting and editorial materials, chronology and workflow, source and document handling, fairness steps, escalation, approval, and post-publication response.
Experience brought to the analysis
Chris’s perspective is grounded in more than three decades of investigative reporting and production, followed by senior standards leadership across major national news organizations. That work involved difficult editorial decisions in investigations, breaking news, broadcast, digital, and other forms of publication.
The analysis is directed to newsroom practice and editorial process. It does not substitute for legal analysis and does not offer legal conclusions or damages opinions.
Initial fit and conflicts review
Because this work is undertaken selectively, an initial non-confidential inquiry should identify the parties, venue, publication or broadcast at issue, current posture, key deadlines, and the specific newsroom standards questions under consideration.
A clear initial scope helps determine whether the matter fits Chris’s experience, whether conflicts or other limitations exist, and what materials would be needed for a meaningful assessment.
Discuss an engagement
Start with a brief, non-confidential note.
Describe the project or matter, its current stage, any important deadline, and the editorial standards questions on which input would be most useful.
Start a conversation